Skip to content
  • EN
  • UA
  • RU
Ukraine War Environmental Consequences Work Group

Ukraine War Environmental Consequences Work Group

Seeking solutions through information sharing about the environmental impacts of the war. UWEC Work Group.

  • Home
  • About UWEC
  • Issues
    • Issue #33
    • Issue #32
    • Issue #31
    • Issues 21-30
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #25
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #21
    • Issues 11-20
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #11
    • Issues 1-10
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #9
      • Issue #8
      • Issue #7
      • Issue #6
      • Issue #5
      • Issue #4
      • Issue #3
      • Issue #2
      • Issue #1
  • Highlights
  • Contacts
  • Resources
    • Webinars
  • Toggle search form

“Combat mosquitoes” in reverse: Russia creates cyber-pigeons and dreams of “reprogramming” Ukrainians

Posted on February 27, 2026February 27, 2026 By Editor No Comments on “Combat mosquitoes” in reverse: Russia creates cyber-pigeons and dreams of “reprogramming” Ukrainians

We have already covered how, since the start of the full-scale invasion, Russian propaganda has tried to frighten the world with stories about “American biolabs” in Ukraine. From UN podiums and television screens, Russian officials seriously spoke about infected birds, “ethnically targeted” pathogens, and even combat mosquitoes allegedly aimed at Russians. At the time, these claims looked like a surreal fake. The irony, however, is that it is Russia itself that has taken up the creation of “combat animals” and mind-control technologies.

The media outlet T-Invariant has published an investigation into the Russian startup Neiry, a company working to turn ordinary pigeons into controllable “bio-drones.” According to journalists, the company implants electrodes into the birds’ brains to remotely control their flight.

Unlike the mythical Ukrainian laboratories, everything here is real and backed by money from Russia’s elite. Hundreds of millions of rubles have been invested in the project, including funds from oligarch Vladimir Potanin’s Interros Foundation. Moreover, scientific support for Neiry’s projects is provided by staff of Moscow State University’s Institute of Artificial Intelligence, headed by Katerina Tikhonova, the younger daughter of Vladimir Putin.

cyber-pigeons and cyber-mosquitos

Environmental fakes: How false environmental news is used in the information war

A cyborg pigeon with a small electronic “backpack” is only the tip of the iceberg. Far more disturbing are the plans of Neiry’s founder, Alexander Panov, for people. In his blog, the entrepreneur openly reflects on technologies for “selling people to the state” and “correcting” their consciousness.

Residents of occupied territories occupy a special place in his fantasies. Panov writes that Ukrainians, whom he considers carriers of a “Russian cultural code” but “intoxicated by nonsense,” can and should be “reprogrammed.” In the businessman’s view, such neuro-correction of brains would cost the state less than raising new citizens “of its own culture.”

Experts interviewed by T-Invariant remain skeptical about the startup’s technical achievements, describing them as “forced optimism” aimed at acquiring government funding.

Support UWEC Work Group

Scientists note that an ordinary drone is more effective than cyber-pigeons, while goals such as “reading minds” and controlling consciousness remain unattainable for science. However, the very precedent is revealing. What the Kremlin for years baselessly accused Ukraine and the West of—inhumane experiments on animals and attempts at biological control over people—is now openly declared as a goal of Russian tech startups financed by figures from the closest circle of power.

Recent posts:

  • Environmental consequences of the war in Ukraine: Dec 2025 – February 2026 review
  • How new technology is helping make Ukraine’s demining process greener
  • Building Back Business as usual: Can the Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment provide strategic planning support for green rebuilding of Ukraine?
  • LNG dependency poses a risk to Europe’s climate ambitions
  • Four years of full-scale war in Ukraine: the environmental perspective
Highlights

Related Posts

  • How Ukraine can integrate environmental security into its national defense strategy Highlights
  • Liquid iron curtain: how the Dnipro turned from a cradle of life into a weapon of mass destruction Highlights
  • Wetlands as natural defense: how the Irpin wetlands stopped Russian tanks Highlights
  • Occupied agricultural lands and biodiversity at risk in Ukraine Highlights
  • Fiber-optic drones in Ukraine: military advantage and emerging environmental risks Highlights
  • Ukraine’s peatlands and wetlands: climate value, legal gaps and restoration urgency Highlights

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Telegram
  • Bluesky
Support Us

Topics

  • Civil society (36)
  • Climate Crisis (11)
  • Crisis & Cooperation (49)
  • Direct Impact (56)
  • Ecosystems (64)
  • Environmental Policy (82)
  • Green Recovery (42)
  • Highlights (30)
  • Issues (1)
  • Sanctions (12)
  • Uncategorized (8)
  • Webinars (11)

Sign-up for Our Issues:

Copyright © 2022-2025 Ukraine War Environmental Consequences Working Group.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme