Skip to content
  • EN
  • UA
  • RU
Ukraine War Environmental Consequences Work Group

Ukraine War Environmental Consequences Work Group

Seeking solutions through information sharing about the environmental impacts of the war. UWEC Work Group.

  • Home
  • About UWEC
  • Issues
    • Issue #27
    • Issue #26
    • Issue #25
    • Issue #24
    • Issue #23
    • Issue #22
    • Issue #21
    • Issues 11-20
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #11
    • Issues 1-10
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #9
      • Issue #8
      • Issue #7
      • Issue #6
      • Issue #5
      • Issue #4
      • Issue #3
      • Issue #2
      • Issue #1
  • Contacts
  • Resources
    • Webinars
  • Toggle search form

Militarization of Crimea. An infographic

Posted on November 16, 2022December 28, 2023 By Editor No Comments on Militarization of Crimea. An infographic

By Valeria Kolodezhna

For the last eight years, Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula and its unique biological diversity have been under occupation. Over that time, its landscape has been actively used for military training. Since February 2022, it has served as a springboard for the military invasion. All of these factors have had a negative impact on the environment. 

UWEC Work Group is currently studying the consequences of the military occupation of Crimea. Thanks to the data we’ve assembled, we can already say that there has been significant damage to unique natural areas. Steppe areas have been largely destroyed as a result of the military exercises, and conservation activities in some regions have been suspended.

Soon we will publish the results of our study, so stay tuned to our website, Twitter, and Facebook. In the meantime, we are sharing an infographic that clearly shows the environmental consequences of the military occupation of Crimea.

Crymea_military_pressedDownload

Show full map at new tab

Main image credit: gazeta.ru

Direct Impact, Ecosystems

Related Posts

  • Should the Oskil Reservoir
    be rebuilt after the war?
    Direct Impact
  • Pollution of the Bug estuary following damage to Mykolaiv’s main wastewater treatment facility Direct Impact
  • How restoration of Ukraine’s ecosystems is being discussed at European conferences Ecosystems
  • Restoring Ukraine’s nature post-war: Hopes and risks Ecosystems
  • Protecting the environment in times of war: An interview with environmentalist Yehor Hrynyk Civil society
  • Sleight of land: How Russian authorities in occupied Crimea are using legal trickery to develop protected areas Direct Impact

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Telegram
  • Bluesky
Support Us

Topics

  • Civil society (25)
  • Climate Crisis (9)
  • Crisis & Cooperation (33)
  • Direct Impact (47)
  • Ecosystems (51)
  • Environmental Policy (61)
  • Green Recovery (31)
  • Issues (1)
  • Sanctions (9)
  • Uncategorized (7)
  • Webinars (11)

Sign-up for Our Issues:

Copyright © 2022-2025 Ukraine War Environmental Consequences Working Group.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme